Bublers, a horror for most Australian citizens, and public schools across the globe. On our first day at school, it was such an exciting little contraption, it was like a fountain that you were allowed to drink out of, hence the street/school yard (hey it was near a street) name of 'fountain', because seriously did it not annoy you that you were always told not to drink from the fountain? Turns out your parents were right.
The human body has a high proportion of water, and you think that with our recent rain (I'm not going to go into the Victorian or Queensland floods, having successfully decided I wanted to live) that we would be able to keep our fountains going. But every single one that I have ever tried has sucked, not literally but figuratively, unless you consider not working well literal. The water pressure was terrible, forcing you to put your mouth close to the tap, and for many people this was too close. Some people made out with the tap, others decided to force smaller people to make out with the tap. Sure blood and mucus wash away, and it is left clean, that is why those people on all those cop shows never catch anybody...wait a second wasn't there that guy that...did they? No, wait...., that is not how body fluids work!
Also water is a notoriously good environment for bacteria and protozoa, and algae, but you knew all that, that is why people wash their hands....no people don't do that either... I'm sure there is a good thing about them. Think, think... aha in a movie this one time it caused a girl to bend over and...wait, didn't really need a bubler for that.
Also on a hot day, there was always some idiot who was trying to fill up his bottle from the slow ass bubler...yeah pal, recess isn't that long....move out of the way! Or the people who were actually sick trying to use the bubler...these are the same type of people that gave us chickenpox, and year after year bring us the common cold, and will eventually fulfil their purpose of bringing upon the zombie apocalypse because hey somebody had to be the first zombie. Mmmmm....
They tried on certain fountains to amend this by placing a small filter tap, that worked less well then the damn fountain, so not only am I getting a poor drink, but I have to watch awkwardly at some idiot filling up his 2L water bottle so he can play one game of octo.
In essence bublers are some the evils of public education, and no they do not get better when you go to university, but worse because now you know that at least one person has been to the microbiology lab...and I'm not to fond of that green mold.
Is bottled water the answer though, it does not come from the mountain or spring (really? You thought it did?), but mostly from the local water catchment area, usually with less strict health regulations that dictate the levels in our tap water. It also costs substantially more, and most of the bottle; add chemicals that encourage microbiological growth, cause harm, and are bad for the environment. Yay! Sounds good uncle bill.
Personally if people want to shell out money for the 'peace of mind' factor, let them be. But to take away that factor of our education, to separate the pretentious from the humble, the rich from the poor, University of Canberra who do you think you are?! Removal of bottled water to 'help the environment', and your replacement is bublers?! Seriously a bubler is out in the public, and people are idiots, we destroy and taint (figurative and literally) every public thing given to us. So it is a choice of the lesser of two evils?
Why not have the clubs each hand out cordial, or have somebody come and sterilise the bublers with some pure vodka- you might have an increase in drinkage after the sterilisation. Or have normal taps placed around, they poor better, fill bottles faster, and because of their relatedness to the ground less people will bend down to make out with it.
Hopefully I haven't turned you off of water, because remember folks- you need it to live.
Dale Stam
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Here's Stammy!
I liiiiiivvvvvvveveeeeeeeeeeee!
Like the great phoenix, I have arisen from the ashes of 2010, true it has taken some time for me to recuperate but the fact of the matter is that I am back and writing.
Thanks for all that came back to reread certain topics, and a great salutations to my northern hemisphere friends, thank you.
Do I have a firmer grasp on what this blog will be about? No.
Do I care? Not really, let the random posts begin.
Like the great phoenix, I have arisen from the ashes of 2010, true it has taken some time for me to recuperate but the fact of the matter is that I am back and writing.
Thanks for all that came back to reread certain topics, and a great salutations to my northern hemisphere friends, thank you.
Do I have a firmer grasp on what this blog will be about? No.
Do I care? Not really, let the random posts begin.
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Do you require more Spam?
My previous post regarding the upcoming Livid Production of Spamalot has been rather popular and some are probably wondering why there has been such a long gap in between my reporting on it- no I did not forget about it- but I was in discussion with the committee board of Livid to see if I would be able to bring you an in depth exploration of how a show is made. Unfortunately I have been unsuccessful in my attempt and therefore must rely upon those in the know to give me some heads up-hint, hint. Either way this is the latest update;
Rehearsals for the 'Knights' have been progressing smoothly for roughly a month now, with the majority of their preliminary dance sequences plotted out- I think the one they were currently working on was 'The Knights of the Round Table/Camelot'.
I have heard that many of the Knights have been blown away by the speed and skill of Narelle on the taps. She is 'fast as' according to one source, and has been effectively propelling the Knights into their dances.
I believe that the whole cast recently got together for their first group rehearsal- 'meet and greet', and all have high hopes.
2011 is shaping up to be a raspberry jam packed theatre year for locals, and for those overseas I guess it is interesting to find out how a typical Aussie town engages in the theatrical arts.
Waiting Avidly.
Dale Stam
Rehearsals for the 'Knights' have been progressing smoothly for roughly a month now, with the majority of their preliminary dance sequences plotted out- I think the one they were currently working on was 'The Knights of the Round Table/Camelot'.
I have heard that many of the Knights have been blown away by the speed and skill of Narelle on the taps. She is 'fast as' according to one source, and has been effectively propelling the Knights into their dances.
I believe that the whole cast recently got together for their first group rehearsal- 'meet and greet', and all have high hopes.
2011 is shaping up to be a raspberry jam packed theatre year for locals, and for those overseas I guess it is interesting to find out how a typical Aussie town engages in the theatrical arts.
Waiting Avidly.
Dale Stam
Friday, November 26, 2010
Obesity Article 2
This is the second article I have written in regards to obesity. It might have some overlap with the first article.
Obesity
South Australia had the worst rate of childhood obesity in Australia, and to combat this, the SA Government put in place a program that had been shown to be successful in France, the EPODE (Ensemble, prevenons l'obesite des enfants or ‘Together, let's prevent obesity in children’), which involves calculating the BMI (Body mass index) of the children and informing parents of those in danger and providing them with information and guidelines to improve their child’s health.
A few years later the children who would have been exposed to this new program are now nearing their teens. In March the Cancer Council of South Australia found that many of our teens still have unhealthy eating patterns. The respondents of their research were between the ages of 12 and 17 years, the future of Australia, this is why the Cancer Council SA (CCSA) is hoping that Julia Gillard’s Government will put in place some new legislation that will aid in curbing the ongoing battle with childhood obesity.
Almost one quarter of Australian children are overweight or obese, and the CCSA believes that their ‘Right Bites’ educational program needs to be introduced to all schools to inform the students about healthier eating habits and how they can improve their current situation. Currently the program is offered to Government Funded Public Schools, but this means students from Independent and Catholic Schools do not receive the full benefit of this program, but those of its guideline.
28% of respondents ate chocolate bars or chips five or more times per week, while nearly 40% say that they eat fast food two or more times a week. More than half of the respondents (57%) drink high sugar drinks three or more times a week, whereas only 23% are eating enough vegetables to sustain their dietary requirements.
To aid in the success of the program the CCSA are calling for the removal or regulation of fast food advertisements and sponsorships from the schools, while also actively restricting the unhealthy foods that are served to students during recess and lunches. With an increase in fruits and vegetables available, the lack of advertising, the restriction of unhealthy items, and their studies it is hoped that the trend will be reversed, and that future studies show a decrease in this alarming trend.
Chief Executive of the CCSA Professor Brenda Wilson states,“Obesity causes cancer and is a major contributor to the global burden of chronic disease and disability. Levels of childhood obesity have risen dramatically and are unacceptably high. Adolescents are eating more fast foods, which are often high in fat and sugar. Obesity in children is a major health concern in terms of cancer-risk later in life.”
The passing on the habits of healthy eating and physical activity has always been reliant upon the family culture, but with the increase in working hours in recent decades, parents are feeling betrayed by schools. Professor Wilson said that ‘To promote healthy eating habits in children, it is important to provide an environment which fosters this- at home and at school’.
Advertising restrictions would be put in place to aid parents in moving their children to healthier options. Children do not have as keen an understanding of advertising as adults and are more likely therefore to be influenced by advertising, leading to the dreaded ‘Pester Power’ that often overwhelms parents who are working long days. Parents are feeling undermined by food advertisers who poach their children while they are not looking, or while they are at school. Many parents support the CCSA’s call to restrict food advertisements to children. The ban would protect children between the hours of 7am and 9am, and 4pm till 9pm on weekdays, and from 7am till 9pm on weekends- effectively protecting the children from the advertising.
Parents are not able to watch over their children’s eating habits as easily as previous generations might have been, and often bad habits are carried outside of the parents view. If the Government were to take this on it would allow for children to be educated about healthy eating at home and at schools. Students spend up to six hours at school and are in a position to influence the habits of students on a level near a parent compared to various surveys.
Australia is recognised as one of the most overweight nations in the world, and the introduction of these initiatives will allow for across the board education on the subject. Teacher, students, their siblings, their parents, and the rest of the community will all be influenced and informed about healthy lifestyles. ‘Obesity causes cancer and is a major contributor to the global burden of chronic disease and disability’ said Professor Wilson. This is one of the CCSA’s 12 items proposed to the Government to reduce the effects of Cancer upon Australians, and they hope they will be taken up by the Gillard Government.
Obesity
South Australia had the worst rate of childhood obesity in Australia, and to combat this, the SA Government put in place a program that had been shown to be successful in France, the EPODE (Ensemble, prevenons l'obesite des enfants or ‘Together, let's prevent obesity in children’), which involves calculating the BMI (Body mass index) of the children and informing parents of those in danger and providing them with information and guidelines to improve their child’s health.
A few years later the children who would have been exposed to this new program are now nearing their teens. In March the Cancer Council of South Australia found that many of our teens still have unhealthy eating patterns. The respondents of their research were between the ages of 12 and 17 years, the future of Australia, this is why the Cancer Council SA (CCSA) is hoping that Julia Gillard’s Government will put in place some new legislation that will aid in curbing the ongoing battle with childhood obesity.
Almost one quarter of Australian children are overweight or obese, and the CCSA believes that their ‘Right Bites’ educational program needs to be introduced to all schools to inform the students about healthier eating habits and how they can improve their current situation. Currently the program is offered to Government Funded Public Schools, but this means students from Independent and Catholic Schools do not receive the full benefit of this program, but those of its guideline.
28% of respondents ate chocolate bars or chips five or more times per week, while nearly 40% say that they eat fast food two or more times a week. More than half of the respondents (57%) drink high sugar drinks three or more times a week, whereas only 23% are eating enough vegetables to sustain their dietary requirements.
To aid in the success of the program the CCSA are calling for the removal or regulation of fast food advertisements and sponsorships from the schools, while also actively restricting the unhealthy foods that are served to students during recess and lunches. With an increase in fruits and vegetables available, the lack of advertising, the restriction of unhealthy items, and their studies it is hoped that the trend will be reversed, and that future studies show a decrease in this alarming trend.
Chief Executive of the CCSA Professor Brenda Wilson states,“Obesity causes cancer and is a major contributor to the global burden of chronic disease and disability. Levels of childhood obesity have risen dramatically and are unacceptably high. Adolescents are eating more fast foods, which are often high in fat and sugar. Obesity in children is a major health concern in terms of cancer-risk later in life.”
The passing on the habits of healthy eating and physical activity has always been reliant upon the family culture, but with the increase in working hours in recent decades, parents are feeling betrayed by schools. Professor Wilson said that ‘To promote healthy eating habits in children, it is important to provide an environment which fosters this- at home and at school’.
Advertising restrictions would be put in place to aid parents in moving their children to healthier options. Children do not have as keen an understanding of advertising as adults and are more likely therefore to be influenced by advertising, leading to the dreaded ‘Pester Power’ that often overwhelms parents who are working long days. Parents are feeling undermined by food advertisers who poach their children while they are not looking, or while they are at school. Many parents support the CCSA’s call to restrict food advertisements to children. The ban would protect children between the hours of 7am and 9am, and 4pm till 9pm on weekdays, and from 7am till 9pm on weekends- effectively protecting the children from the advertising.
Parents are not able to watch over their children’s eating habits as easily as previous generations might have been, and often bad habits are carried outside of the parents view. If the Government were to take this on it would allow for children to be educated about healthy eating at home and at schools. Students spend up to six hours at school and are in a position to influence the habits of students on a level near a parent compared to various surveys.
Australia is recognised as one of the most overweight nations in the world, and the introduction of these initiatives will allow for across the board education on the subject. Teacher, students, their siblings, their parents, and the rest of the community will all be influenced and informed about healthy lifestyles. ‘Obesity causes cancer and is a major contributor to the global burden of chronic disease and disability’ said Professor Wilson. This is one of the CCSA’s 12 items proposed to the Government to reduce the effects of Cancer upon Australians, and they hope they will be taken up by the Gillard Government.
Obesity Article 1
This is the 1st Article I wrote regarding the theme of obesity and what is being done.
Why are our children overweight? The obesity epidemic.
Australia is the largest society in the world around the waist, outstripping our major rivals of both the UK and the USA. However this is not one first place position that we as a society want. 20-25% of our children our considered obese. Obesity is a condition where fat becomes a health hazard, with one of the primary causes being an energy imbalance which is linked to the increase in sedentary leisure activities, and the increase in high energy food consumption.
Following current trends by 2020, 80% of adults and a third of children will be obese or overweight. There have been various attempts to reverse this trend, but it appears that it is an uphill battle that Australia and the rest of the world are losing. Nearly half of all children who are obese will remain obese into adulthood. These people also have a much higher rate of heart related diseases such as high blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar. Obesity can also contribute to respiratory, orthopaedic and gastric problems. Problems related to obesity are a substantial drain on the Australian health system, and will soon be the number one preventable form of death, outstripping smoking. There are a multitude of causes for this situation, which all must be considered if the situation is going to improve.
Just like the topics of global warming/environment and population the obesity epidemic seems to be called up for discussion but not much is actually done to curb this problem. We have had various sports teams sponsoring sport and special PE activities at schools. But limited classes will not fulfill the purpose of frequent exercise needed to combat this problem.
A study in Queensland found that about 60% of children have poor motor skills, and 30% had low fitness levels. Both figures could be improved by the development and enhancement of Physical Education at our schools, but it appears that many schools are restricting their PE lessons, or removing them all together with little to no resistance from the school communities.
With the Howard Government pumping tax payer money mostly into private schools, those in the public system have been left trying to overcome financial difficulties- old text books, faulty air conditioning and heating systems and old or lack of sports gear. This lack of resources has increased the possibility of students not getting a lot of the benefits of the more funded private schools.
This has now been improved slightly but the effects of this still ruminates through our schools, but as some experts have said a few hours of PE a week will not accommodate the exercise our students require. This under allocation to sporting in the school system may be a course for the growing childhood obesity.
In Australian society sports people our held up as role models for our youth, but for those students who are not as gifted are often ridiculed and bullied. These students will then start to view sport and PE negatively and this could contribute to the lack of exercise aspect of childhood obesity.
Another factor contributing to the lack of exercise aspect is the growing technology and leisure activities of modern children. Computer games, and social networking are keeping students inside and in a passive state for longer periods of time then they were generations ago. A lot of employment in the future will be using technology skills from these activities, but we still need to encourage our children to engage in physical activity every day.
Parents set up the food schedule and should find ways of implementing healthier foods, whilst restricting the foods better left as treats. But with the constant increase in the price of food, especially healthier foods it seems that many households are left in a position where they are unable to afford to eat the healthy options, and thus are forced to settle. Some bodies have suggested that the Government should offer a subsidy on healthy food, allowing more households to afford it, however with the addictive qualities of a lot of unhealthy foods, it is doubtful this would be effective.
The South Australian Government has adopted a method that has been considered a success in France, the EPODE (Ensemble, prevenons l'obesite des enfants or ‘Together, let's prevent obesity in children’), which involves calculating the BMI (Body mass index) of the children and informing parents of those in danger and providing them with information and guidelines to improve their child’s health. However not all schools would be able to participate in the proposed plan, suggesting that community action will also be required.
Obesity is an ongoing problem that keeps being fed when we are unable to act and it is through education that many lives will future and present lives will be saved from this terrible disease.
Why are our children overweight? The obesity epidemic.
Australia is the largest society in the world around the waist, outstripping our major rivals of both the UK and the USA. However this is not one first place position that we as a society want. 20-25% of our children our considered obese. Obesity is a condition where fat becomes a health hazard, with one of the primary causes being an energy imbalance which is linked to the increase in sedentary leisure activities, and the increase in high energy food consumption.
Following current trends by 2020, 80% of adults and a third of children will be obese or overweight. There have been various attempts to reverse this trend, but it appears that it is an uphill battle that Australia and the rest of the world are losing. Nearly half of all children who are obese will remain obese into adulthood. These people also have a much higher rate of heart related diseases such as high blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar. Obesity can also contribute to respiratory, orthopaedic and gastric problems. Problems related to obesity are a substantial drain on the Australian health system, and will soon be the number one preventable form of death, outstripping smoking. There are a multitude of causes for this situation, which all must be considered if the situation is going to improve.
Just like the topics of global warming/environment and population the obesity epidemic seems to be called up for discussion but not much is actually done to curb this problem. We have had various sports teams sponsoring sport and special PE activities at schools. But limited classes will not fulfill the purpose of frequent exercise needed to combat this problem.
A study in Queensland found that about 60% of children have poor motor skills, and 30% had low fitness levels. Both figures could be improved by the development and enhancement of Physical Education at our schools, but it appears that many schools are restricting their PE lessons, or removing them all together with little to no resistance from the school communities.
With the Howard Government pumping tax payer money mostly into private schools, those in the public system have been left trying to overcome financial difficulties- old text books, faulty air conditioning and heating systems and old or lack of sports gear. This lack of resources has increased the possibility of students not getting a lot of the benefits of the more funded private schools.
This has now been improved slightly but the effects of this still ruminates through our schools, but as some experts have said a few hours of PE a week will not accommodate the exercise our students require. This under allocation to sporting in the school system may be a course for the growing childhood obesity.
In Australian society sports people our held up as role models for our youth, but for those students who are not as gifted are often ridiculed and bullied. These students will then start to view sport and PE negatively and this could contribute to the lack of exercise aspect of childhood obesity.
Another factor contributing to the lack of exercise aspect is the growing technology and leisure activities of modern children. Computer games, and social networking are keeping students inside and in a passive state for longer periods of time then they were generations ago. A lot of employment in the future will be using technology skills from these activities, but we still need to encourage our children to engage in physical activity every day.
Parents set up the food schedule and should find ways of implementing healthier foods, whilst restricting the foods better left as treats. But with the constant increase in the price of food, especially healthier foods it seems that many households are left in a position where they are unable to afford to eat the healthy options, and thus are forced to settle. Some bodies have suggested that the Government should offer a subsidy on healthy food, allowing more households to afford it, however with the addictive qualities of a lot of unhealthy foods, it is doubtful this would be effective.
The South Australian Government has adopted a method that has been considered a success in France, the EPODE (Ensemble, prevenons l'obesite des enfants or ‘Together, let's prevent obesity in children’), which involves calculating the BMI (Body mass index) of the children and informing parents of those in danger and providing them with information and guidelines to improve their child’s health. However not all schools would be able to participate in the proposed plan, suggesting that community action will also be required.
Obesity is an ongoing problem that keeps being fed when we are unable to act and it is through education that many lives will future and present lives will be saved from this terrible disease.
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Strange Bedfellow the New Review
Yes it is sort of what some of you wanted and have been looking for, hopefully it does not dissapoint. DS.
Strange Bedfellows: A New Musical has recently finished their run in Albury to great local acclaim, and was seen by over 8 thousand people. Bringing an amazing event to the local community through tourism, and cultural land-marking. The world premier season was well accepted by those who came to see it, and was a good way of highlighting the region.
A great deal of thanks needs to be given to Instinct Entertainment for choosing to do the production in the same region as the film, the Regent Cinema which allowed for the conversion of Cinema One back into the Regent Theatre. Then finally the AWTC and the volunteers who aided in showing people to their seats, the selling of merchandise and creating the feeling of a community event.
Do not worry though I am not an unrestrictive cheerleader- I do not look as good in the uniform and short skirt as either Claire Bennet, Kirsten Dunst, or any of the girls from Glee. But this is a review of the production both the good and the areas that might need improvement.
NOTES: This is based upon my viewing of the show on the soft opening and then over the next few times that I was engaged as a volunteer.
* The Regent Theatre
As would be expected from a converted cinema there was a bit of diversity. The upper level where most locals would be familiar with- because this is where they would sit for a film had nice comfy wide seats. They had cup holders and the lights for the isle were bright and were a good guide to aid in finding seats.
In comparison to the much older and less used seats on the lower level. They were given a spruce up for the show, but they were frankly a different kind of seat than on the upper level. These were leather seats, that were thinner, and did not have cup holders. These were more typical theatre style seats- and they were not uncomfortable. But they were a little faded from their age. The aisle lights were less bright down here and thus required the volunteers to rely upon their flashlights more than they had to upstairs.
In total the theatre was able to sit roughly one thousand people if both upstairs and downstairs were filled to capacity. The shows that I attended went roughly something like this;
- Near full capacity on soft opening.
- About 3/4 for about two shows.
- Then between 300-400 for the next few shows.
On the tickets instead of the simple labels of upper level or upstairs we were given the phrase- Dress Circle; and the lower level was referred to as the stalls; this caused a bit of confusion for patrons coming to see the show who were not familiar with these terms, and thus caused some delay in getting people to the seats on certain shows because they had to be sent to the other level.
* Staging
The stage had a rotating centre which reminded me of Les Miserables, and Thank God You're Here, but it was a quick efficient staging choice which is both aesthetically pleasing and removed the need to bring out different back drops for every scene. The rotating centre of the stage was able to fulfil the purpose of every scene with perhaps a change in lighting or the with the actors bringing on a limited amount of furniture or props to keep the scenes rolling, often while we are focused on the action down stage.
The orchestra was a factor that the production was pushing as a selling point. That the show was not a prerecorded show, but had a live orchestra. The orchestra instead of being placed in a pit at the front of the stage, they were relocated to a platform to the upper left (from the audience) which was depending upon where the audience was sitting was visible.
View of the Orchestra results;
- Upper level on the right or at the centre people were able to see the orchestra.
- Similar for down stairs.
- If anybody was placed on the left side, they were mostly hidden.
Also you were only really able to see certain players even when seated in the best viewed seats- so if it was the orchestra that you were mostly drawn to, then the staging was a little annoying.
Annoying it may be, it was unavoidable given the shape of the Regent Theatre. The production company was able to extend the stage out into the audience- to improve the view and immersion for the audience, and they also had to re-enforce it so that it was able to support the rotating stage. For them to have extended the stage area to produce an orchestra pit would not have only reduced the amount of people able to see the show, but would have added an unnecessary cost to the production.
The back drop for Yack had a dusty country feeling that enabled me to get into the mind set of these country people, and with the added lights it was also equally able to be a Sydney street. The cutouts of the magpies and cockatoos where also a really simple mi's en scene that added to the atmosphere of the stage.
* Lighting
The lighting for the majority of the show was sufficient there were a few moments that I think was a little odd however.
Near the beginning of the show when Ralph (John Wood) and Vince (Peter Cousens) head to the first town meeting, there is a moment when they are still in shadow whilst talking. A few seconds later we see that the chairs for the town meeting scene have been moved on, but does this really need to be hidden from the audience or was it supposed to show a passage of time. If so why are they still having the same conversation as when the light was still on? It just seemed a little odd, and either needs to be quicker or it needs to be considered for removal.
Lighting however had more of a part to play in the second act- with the Opener of the Second Act using the lighting to hilarious effect, and how one character was able to develop a lighting cue and shade all to themselves. Thus giving the sense that this character is so bright, that they are able to bring new shades to the main characters.
* Sound
The orchestra was well heard and the microphones on the actors were basically invisible, thus allowing the audience to continue with the characters without the sight of microphones dragging them out and reminding them it was a show (What would Brecht say?!).
On the other hand there were times during the show when the lyrics would be difficult to hear. Whether this was a pacing, lyrical, orchestral or sound problem is open to debate- the most pressing example would be the second half of 'On Your Way' and some lines of 'When My Glass is Full'.
* Actors- Peter Cousens as Vince
Peter was a great lead, he was able to capture the frenetic energy of Vince, and could explore the depressive worry, and the exhilarated excitement that the character roams through. He brings a level of quiet charisma and is one of the most experienced members of the cast.
Vince is the driving force of the show who pulls Ralph and in effect the rest of the cast through the hilarity and touching moments of the show. He easily flows from the solemn 'The Old Majestic' into the bouncy and optimistic 'When My Glass is Full'- however on certain nights either he was tired or he was too excited because he would be a bit before the music- but as a professional he was able to cover this to the majority of the audience and flow onwards.
It would be suitable to consider Vince the energetic partner to Ralph's straight man, and often delivers the set up with Ralph giving the punch line. In this process he was able to gain his own set of laughs as well. It was also nice to see that Peter was willing to explore and develop some of his lines in the last week of the show- whether these were notes, or of his own choosing, it was nice to see some further exploration- even if sometimes they did not work.
He is not afraid to put himself out there for the audience to judge with him holding the collective attention of the audience through the two mentioned songs and engage in a dance sequence that purposely compares him to two other dancers.
Favourite Song: You can't really go past 'When My Glass is Full'. It is one of the show highlights, and even if sometimes it he was too fast to be heard, or repeating some lines, it was clear to the audience that he was enjoying it, and we enjoyed it to.
Favourite Line: It is difficult to choose a favourite line considering that a fair portion are set up lines. Deferring away from those, I would have to say 'I didn't know you could be such a....bitch'.
* John Wood as Ralph
As Ralph was the straight man to Cousens Vince, but he easily was a highlight of the show, bringing in more than half of the laughs of the night. It was great casting, playing upon the collective memories of the audience recalling John Wood from his serious role on Blue Healers (for my international readers- this was an Australian Cop Drama), this role pulls a bag over that head- with fruit. He has a great amount of one-liners, some that clearly got some of the biggest laughs of the show. Also being the straight man he is able to use his awkwardness to great comedic effect, in some scenes it is just his body language that instills a laugh within the audience.
He also is allowed to have some touching moments through the connection with his daughter, Carla (played diligently by Ballarat Graduate, Jennifer Robinson). Wood is able to bring an Aussie father figure into these scenes with a sense of ease, that allows the audience to go with the flow.
It should be noted that on one performance that Wood is a good person to have on stage with you, in one performance where it appeared the Cousens had either paused for too long, or had temporarily misplaced his next line, Wood was able to (not perfectly mind you) but effectively summarise Cousens line as Ralph would have done it, allowing the distress of the scene to flow quickly as it should.
Favourite Song: Ralph has decidedly less songs that Vince- but since Cousens is more experience in Musical Theatre this is understandable. Wood has a nice voice, and he does not try any vocal acrobatics to his betterment. He is able to deliver his intention and be heard, with the sense of character required for Musical Theatre- so I hope he will continue to explore it in the future. But song choice, Vocal wise it would have to be 'Now that Was love' the first act- by himself. A short, but heartfelt song about his deceased wife.
Favourite Scene: Though many would probably say the act one finale, where it is a humourous visual joke, I would have to say either of the following would be better;
- During 'After Dinner Mince' where he tries to Mince. The difference in the movement of the different actors is a highlight in this scene.
- Or during his exchange with Vince where they are stating that they could do better if they were really gay.
* Melissa Langton as Vonny
Is an actress I had not heard of before, but she does have a voice, belting out the numbers with a decidedly Aussie twang. She is a confident comedienne, who is not only the Female Love Interest of Vince, but she is not your typical female lead. She is strong, opinionated and is able to give as good as she gets (on second thought maybe she is your typical modern female lead).
She seems a natural in the role inviting us into the show during the opening (though the sip out of the cup was always a little rushed and unnatural). She supplies not only laughs but brings a decidedly softer touch to the show.
Favourite Song: Just about all of her songs are very strong vocally, there is the humourous 'On the Scene Again', or the more touching 'Where have all the good blokes gone', or even her duet with the slightly less confident Jennifer Robinson in the rousing reprise of Robinson's act one 'How can I tell him'.
Favourite Scene: Her actions during the song, 'On the Scene Again', hands down.
*Matt Dyktynski as Erik
Erik is the character that although is stereotypical, is played well to effect, and during the surprise of his character is able to retain the audiences favour through sheer characterisation and professionalism. A hoot in 'After Dinner Mince'.
* Anthony Costanzo as Dolly
Dolly is the light affecting character mentioned before. Some of the lyrics in the Act Two opener are difficult to hear, but the enthusiastic energy flowing through the dance and the vocals will deter you from too close examination, as you get wrapped up in the moment. Sort of reminds me of La Cage La Faux at times, but the music more like Priscilla not necessarily a bad thing.
* Ross Hannaford and Josh Feldschuh as Carbo and Hughie respectively
These two supply the comedic relief and are the main spotlight for the younger people in the community. They are also very talented dancers, with most of the songs they are involved in having physical comedy, and various dance styles. Look out for their relevant song 'I don't know what to do' exploring the dilemma of many country kids.
* Colette Mann as Faith
She takes on the matriarch role, house in her squeaky voice, and little frame. But there is no denying that she has a presence, and though will be overlooked by some, she is an important feature of the show, and gives marvelous support, even having a song dedicated to her. Not as annoying as the Grand Dames that have been overused in Hello Dolly, Mame, Gypsy and so on, she brings comedy back to the older lady position.
* The rest of the cast
Seriously the cast blended together well, with cast from Melbourne treading the same steps as local actors. They were all blended well, and if you were not aware of who was from where, or read the programme before the show, it would be a distraction to try to pick out who was from where.
Local actors took on minor roles, and as part of the chorus, and were all applauded for their efforts. Some making sure to have stories and inside jokes that were a joy for those of us who had known about the show. Dan Carberry's bass was a welcome tone to the cast, filling out a section of the vocals that would have otherwise been low (pardon that). Stephen Armati and his wig joke, and being able to were the gay version of his police uniform were other things for locals to look out for.
Just about everyone from the cast had a moment to shine, even if it was just a line. The only two that do not jump out so were; Maddi Bullock and Ben Yonson, who had fun in various dance sequences and filled out the scene, but I guess I did not notice their time in the light as the others. But that is fine, because that is not the point of the show, otherwise it would be a school recital. Perhaps in the future...?
* Notes
There were a few moments however when it was not quite clean. For example during the opening number there is a line or dialogue and then a pause while people moved forward before they were to sing, it seemed an awkward pause and my one greatest concern with the beginning of the show. Also I understand the corny nostalgic quality of having everyone say a line at the same time ('Yes. That old thing'), it just seemed really out of place in the show.
Also in the second act having the explosive opening number bringing us in, we are then followed by two relatively slower songs in a row- 'The Big Smoke', and 'Joy of being Gay', this was the moment when I saw most fidgeting and so on from the audience. It is not the songs fault, they are both entertaining, they just seemed to roll into one longer song.
I like how they obviously played with the relationship between Carla and Peta during the last week, but the timing on that needs to be fixed before they continue on further because some of it was missed as the stage turns.
* Conclusion
Overall the show was a huge hit, and should be well received elsewhere, and I hope this review has given you a little taste of what to expect when it comes to a town near you. It is an enjoyable night out, and hopefully you will be more lucky to have a Cast Album ready to be purchased...that is the major thing wrong with the World Premier, no album, so you remember the melody of the songs, but are unable to recall all of the lyrics.
To check out the show, or to revisit it with merchandise check below.
www.strangebedfellows.com.au/
I would also invite you to comment and visit (register) the forum where you can discuss this or other posts;
http://dalesnewsblog.46.forumer.com/viewforum.php?f=2
Dale Stam
Strange Bedfellows: A New Musical has recently finished their run in Albury to great local acclaim, and was seen by over 8 thousand people. Bringing an amazing event to the local community through tourism, and cultural land-marking. The world premier season was well accepted by those who came to see it, and was a good way of highlighting the region.
A great deal of thanks needs to be given to Instinct Entertainment for choosing to do the production in the same region as the film, the Regent Cinema which allowed for the conversion of Cinema One back into the Regent Theatre. Then finally the AWTC and the volunteers who aided in showing people to their seats, the selling of merchandise and creating the feeling of a community event.
Do not worry though I am not an unrestrictive cheerleader- I do not look as good in the uniform and short skirt as either Claire Bennet, Kirsten Dunst, or any of the girls from Glee. But this is a review of the production both the good and the areas that might need improvement.
NOTES: This is based upon my viewing of the show on the soft opening and then over the next few times that I was engaged as a volunteer.
* The Regent Theatre
As would be expected from a converted cinema there was a bit of diversity. The upper level where most locals would be familiar with- because this is where they would sit for a film had nice comfy wide seats. They had cup holders and the lights for the isle were bright and were a good guide to aid in finding seats.
In comparison to the much older and less used seats on the lower level. They were given a spruce up for the show, but they were frankly a different kind of seat than on the upper level. These were leather seats, that were thinner, and did not have cup holders. These were more typical theatre style seats- and they were not uncomfortable. But they were a little faded from their age. The aisle lights were less bright down here and thus required the volunteers to rely upon their flashlights more than they had to upstairs.
In total the theatre was able to sit roughly one thousand people if both upstairs and downstairs were filled to capacity. The shows that I attended went roughly something like this;
- Near full capacity on soft opening.
- About 3/4 for about two shows.
- Then between 300-400 for the next few shows.
On the tickets instead of the simple labels of upper level or upstairs we were given the phrase- Dress Circle; and the lower level was referred to as the stalls; this caused a bit of confusion for patrons coming to see the show who were not familiar with these terms, and thus caused some delay in getting people to the seats on certain shows because they had to be sent to the other level.
* Staging
The stage had a rotating centre which reminded me of Les Miserables, and Thank God You're Here, but it was a quick efficient staging choice which is both aesthetically pleasing and removed the need to bring out different back drops for every scene. The rotating centre of the stage was able to fulfil the purpose of every scene with perhaps a change in lighting or the with the actors bringing on a limited amount of furniture or props to keep the scenes rolling, often while we are focused on the action down stage.
The orchestra was a factor that the production was pushing as a selling point. That the show was not a prerecorded show, but had a live orchestra. The orchestra instead of being placed in a pit at the front of the stage, they were relocated to a platform to the upper left (from the audience) which was depending upon where the audience was sitting was visible.
View of the Orchestra results;
- Upper level on the right or at the centre people were able to see the orchestra.
- Similar for down stairs.
- If anybody was placed on the left side, they were mostly hidden.
Also you were only really able to see certain players even when seated in the best viewed seats- so if it was the orchestra that you were mostly drawn to, then the staging was a little annoying.
Annoying it may be, it was unavoidable given the shape of the Regent Theatre. The production company was able to extend the stage out into the audience- to improve the view and immersion for the audience, and they also had to re-enforce it so that it was able to support the rotating stage. For them to have extended the stage area to produce an orchestra pit would not have only reduced the amount of people able to see the show, but would have added an unnecessary cost to the production.
The back drop for Yack had a dusty country feeling that enabled me to get into the mind set of these country people, and with the added lights it was also equally able to be a Sydney street. The cutouts of the magpies and cockatoos where also a really simple mi's en scene that added to the atmosphere of the stage.
* Lighting
The lighting for the majority of the show was sufficient there were a few moments that I think was a little odd however.
Near the beginning of the show when Ralph (John Wood) and Vince (Peter Cousens) head to the first town meeting, there is a moment when they are still in shadow whilst talking. A few seconds later we see that the chairs for the town meeting scene have been moved on, but does this really need to be hidden from the audience or was it supposed to show a passage of time. If so why are they still having the same conversation as when the light was still on? It just seemed a little odd, and either needs to be quicker or it needs to be considered for removal.
Lighting however had more of a part to play in the second act- with the Opener of the Second Act using the lighting to hilarious effect, and how one character was able to develop a lighting cue and shade all to themselves. Thus giving the sense that this character is so bright, that they are able to bring new shades to the main characters.
* Sound
The orchestra was well heard and the microphones on the actors were basically invisible, thus allowing the audience to continue with the characters without the sight of microphones dragging them out and reminding them it was a show (What would Brecht say?!).
On the other hand there were times during the show when the lyrics would be difficult to hear. Whether this was a pacing, lyrical, orchestral or sound problem is open to debate- the most pressing example would be the second half of 'On Your Way' and some lines of 'When My Glass is Full'.
* Actors- Peter Cousens as Vince
Peter was a great lead, he was able to capture the frenetic energy of Vince, and could explore the depressive worry, and the exhilarated excitement that the character roams through. He brings a level of quiet charisma and is one of the most experienced members of the cast.
Vince is the driving force of the show who pulls Ralph and in effect the rest of the cast through the hilarity and touching moments of the show. He easily flows from the solemn 'The Old Majestic' into the bouncy and optimistic 'When My Glass is Full'- however on certain nights either he was tired or he was too excited because he would be a bit before the music- but as a professional he was able to cover this to the majority of the audience and flow onwards.
It would be suitable to consider Vince the energetic partner to Ralph's straight man, and often delivers the set up with Ralph giving the punch line. In this process he was able to gain his own set of laughs as well. It was also nice to see that Peter was willing to explore and develop some of his lines in the last week of the show- whether these were notes, or of his own choosing, it was nice to see some further exploration- even if sometimes they did not work.
He is not afraid to put himself out there for the audience to judge with him holding the collective attention of the audience through the two mentioned songs and engage in a dance sequence that purposely compares him to two other dancers.
Favourite Song: You can't really go past 'When My Glass is Full'. It is one of the show highlights, and even if sometimes it he was too fast to be heard, or repeating some lines, it was clear to the audience that he was enjoying it, and we enjoyed it to.
Favourite Line: It is difficult to choose a favourite line considering that a fair portion are set up lines. Deferring away from those, I would have to say 'I didn't know you could be such a....bitch'.
* John Wood as Ralph
As Ralph was the straight man to Cousens Vince, but he easily was a highlight of the show, bringing in more than half of the laughs of the night. It was great casting, playing upon the collective memories of the audience recalling John Wood from his serious role on Blue Healers (for my international readers- this was an Australian Cop Drama), this role pulls a bag over that head- with fruit. He has a great amount of one-liners, some that clearly got some of the biggest laughs of the show. Also being the straight man he is able to use his awkwardness to great comedic effect, in some scenes it is just his body language that instills a laugh within the audience.
He also is allowed to have some touching moments through the connection with his daughter, Carla (played diligently by Ballarat Graduate, Jennifer Robinson). Wood is able to bring an Aussie father figure into these scenes with a sense of ease, that allows the audience to go with the flow.
It should be noted that on one performance that Wood is a good person to have on stage with you, in one performance where it appeared the Cousens had either paused for too long, or had temporarily misplaced his next line, Wood was able to (not perfectly mind you) but effectively summarise Cousens line as Ralph would have done it, allowing the distress of the scene to flow quickly as it should.
Favourite Song: Ralph has decidedly less songs that Vince- but since Cousens is more experience in Musical Theatre this is understandable. Wood has a nice voice, and he does not try any vocal acrobatics to his betterment. He is able to deliver his intention and be heard, with the sense of character required for Musical Theatre- so I hope he will continue to explore it in the future. But song choice, Vocal wise it would have to be 'Now that Was love' the first act- by himself. A short, but heartfelt song about his deceased wife.
Favourite Scene: Though many would probably say the act one finale, where it is a humourous visual joke, I would have to say either of the following would be better;
- During 'After Dinner Mince' where he tries to Mince. The difference in the movement of the different actors is a highlight in this scene.
- Or during his exchange with Vince where they are stating that they could do better if they were really gay.
* Melissa Langton as Vonny
Is an actress I had not heard of before, but she does have a voice, belting out the numbers with a decidedly Aussie twang. She is a confident comedienne, who is not only the Female Love Interest of Vince, but she is not your typical female lead. She is strong, opinionated and is able to give as good as she gets (on second thought maybe she is your typical modern female lead).
She seems a natural in the role inviting us into the show during the opening (though the sip out of the cup was always a little rushed and unnatural). She supplies not only laughs but brings a decidedly softer touch to the show.
Favourite Song: Just about all of her songs are very strong vocally, there is the humourous 'On the Scene Again', or the more touching 'Where have all the good blokes gone', or even her duet with the slightly less confident Jennifer Robinson in the rousing reprise of Robinson's act one 'How can I tell him'.
Favourite Scene: Her actions during the song, 'On the Scene Again', hands down.
*Matt Dyktynski as Erik
Erik is the character that although is stereotypical, is played well to effect, and during the surprise of his character is able to retain the audiences favour through sheer characterisation and professionalism. A hoot in 'After Dinner Mince'.
* Anthony Costanzo as Dolly
Dolly is the light affecting character mentioned before. Some of the lyrics in the Act Two opener are difficult to hear, but the enthusiastic energy flowing through the dance and the vocals will deter you from too close examination, as you get wrapped up in the moment. Sort of reminds me of La Cage La Faux at times, but the music more like Priscilla not necessarily a bad thing.
* Ross Hannaford and Josh Feldschuh as Carbo and Hughie respectively
These two supply the comedic relief and are the main spotlight for the younger people in the community. They are also very talented dancers, with most of the songs they are involved in having physical comedy, and various dance styles. Look out for their relevant song 'I don't know what to do' exploring the dilemma of many country kids.
* Colette Mann as Faith
She takes on the matriarch role, house in her squeaky voice, and little frame. But there is no denying that she has a presence, and though will be overlooked by some, she is an important feature of the show, and gives marvelous support, even having a song dedicated to her. Not as annoying as the Grand Dames that have been overused in Hello Dolly, Mame, Gypsy and so on, she brings comedy back to the older lady position.
* The rest of the cast
Seriously the cast blended together well, with cast from Melbourne treading the same steps as local actors. They were all blended well, and if you were not aware of who was from where, or read the programme before the show, it would be a distraction to try to pick out who was from where.
Local actors took on minor roles, and as part of the chorus, and were all applauded for their efforts. Some making sure to have stories and inside jokes that were a joy for those of us who had known about the show. Dan Carberry's bass was a welcome tone to the cast, filling out a section of the vocals that would have otherwise been low (pardon that). Stephen Armati and his wig joke, and being able to were the gay version of his police uniform were other things for locals to look out for.
Just about everyone from the cast had a moment to shine, even if it was just a line. The only two that do not jump out so were; Maddi Bullock and Ben Yonson, who had fun in various dance sequences and filled out the scene, but I guess I did not notice their time in the light as the others. But that is fine, because that is not the point of the show, otherwise it would be a school recital. Perhaps in the future...?
* Notes
There were a few moments however when it was not quite clean. For example during the opening number there is a line or dialogue and then a pause while people moved forward before they were to sing, it seemed an awkward pause and my one greatest concern with the beginning of the show. Also I understand the corny nostalgic quality of having everyone say a line at the same time ('Yes. That old thing'), it just seemed really out of place in the show.
Also in the second act having the explosive opening number bringing us in, we are then followed by two relatively slower songs in a row- 'The Big Smoke', and 'Joy of being Gay', this was the moment when I saw most fidgeting and so on from the audience. It is not the songs fault, they are both entertaining, they just seemed to roll into one longer song.
I like how they obviously played with the relationship between Carla and Peta during the last week, but the timing on that needs to be fixed before they continue on further because some of it was missed as the stage turns.
* Conclusion
Overall the show was a huge hit, and should be well received elsewhere, and I hope this review has given you a little taste of what to expect when it comes to a town near you. It is an enjoyable night out, and hopefully you will be more lucky to have a Cast Album ready to be purchased...that is the major thing wrong with the World Premier, no album, so you remember the melody of the songs, but are unable to recall all of the lyrics.
To check out the show, or to revisit it with merchandise check below.
www.strangebedfellows.com.au/
I would also invite you to comment and visit (register) the forum where you can discuss this or other posts;
http://dalesnewsblog.46.forumer.com/viewforum.php?f=2
Dale Stam
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Strange Bedfellows in Harry Potter's Deathly Hallows
Strange Bedfellows: A New Musical has been running rather successfully in Albury for the last few weeks, and I have been part of the fantastic volunteer group of the AWTC- which has enabled me to not only aid the production but give me the opportunity to see this show a few times before it moves on to bigger towns, and see our local talent mixing it up with the talented Melbourne cast- all blend well. For those who might be thinking this will be a review of the show- I'm sorry to have mislead you- a review will come after the 19th, this is to talk about the experience of last night.
After the show the majority of cast and volunteers went down to the Wine Room to celebrate Joseph's birthday (the Head of AWTC). It seemed as if we had all flooded into this bar and well being loud theatre people, the bar quickly became ours. It was nice to see the actors of the show at rest- it is one of those 'humanising' aspects that allows us to view these what some people would call 'stars' as humans. To see John Wood smiling and laughing with a drink in his hand, and to see Peter Cousens leaning back in his chair, with an air of relaxing relief. It reminds me of how I felt after various shows, and at parties...just being able to enjoy where I was at that point in time. To be content.
After a rousing performance of 'Happy Birthday' we enjoyed some cup cakes...crunchie or cherry ripe- which were not only rich, but had actual chunks inside- a splendid- elegant touch to the proceedings. My thoughts were briefly cast back to the homeless man who had been outside of the theatre. Is my enjoyment of this moment a slap in his face? Is the enjoyment of oneself more important then the benefit of others- would he have even accepted my cupcake- he seemed to be spiteful that we were promoting a show that in his own words 'only the rich can see'. Would giving him the cake have made him into what he most hated, rich. Would he have even understood the metaphysical property of this transaction? He was also 'fighting the devil', so I am pretty sure he would have not liked the cake if he was true to his convictions- because to indulge so would have sent his mind off- if we bring into the fold the previous question.
Anyway we headed on down to the theatre before the lock out to see the new Harry Potter. We headed in and lined up, then behind us lined up Peter and Melissa Langton (Vonny). We waited for a few minutes and wondered why the line was not moving. It turns out that there was actually up to three different lines, and I was out of line. I do not know how this had happened, I had not moved. In the middle of this angst, Bec Simmons took a slap, and I spun around into Josh Feldschuh (Hughie) and he fell back to. Bec had successfully taken out one volunteer and one cast member in one slap...she has got some hand.
Eventually we got into the cinema. We all scattered around trying to figure out where we should sit. We had about ten minutes until midnight, with jokes and jaffa's being hurled. It was a great atmosphere. Our inspiring chants of preview, preview, preview were unsuccessful in making the previews start...although I understand. The law states that the cinema could not show the film until just after midnight- and because the film (is it still a roll of film nowadays?) comes complete with the previews attached they are classified as the same thing. One of the cast actually made a good comment that the film itself is like a 2 plus hour preview.
After this we had a few unsuccessful countdowns for the start of the film, probably because all of our clocks and watches had different times- we should have synchronised people! Then the lights went dark, and the film began.
Having not read beyond book 4 in the series, I was new to the whole horcrux thing. I understood that it was the containment of Voldemort's soul, which was split into 7 odd pieces, but I was wondering if that was so, wouldn't each destruction of a horcrux shift him further towards the remaining parts of his soul...was his soul divided into certain sections, or just randomly?
Besides this, HP 7 P1 was starting to head into the area that a lot of us have been waiting for...a more grungy war-like picture. It removed the easy landscape of Hogwarts- and placed us into a world where there is an overwhelming power, and various resistance groups running around. For those who know their history, or dystopian fiction, it is easy to pick up the references to totalitarianism, and oppression. I was reminded of various things such as the rounding up of the half bloods in relation to the rounding up of people of the Jewish faith, or the Reds in McCarthy America. The blatant propaganda of the Soviet and Nazi periods. The rigged court room trials of the Witch Hunts (oddly appropriate reference). The use of codewords and secret phrases we have heard of or seen in spy movies. It easily classifies as the darkest film because it deals with these foundations, as compared to the previous- teen angst and the 'big baddie'- it fleshed out the darkness in the world.
Obviously not having read the book, certain character names slipped by me, and some of their reasoning seemed a little convenient. At the heart of this film are the three leads, sure there is still the supporting cast which do well, but they are less important this time around. Each actor has grown into their role, and the audience was having fun with the exploration of the depth of these characters. It was also nice to see some stretching by the actors into areas that they had not been able to explore before. Rupert Grint is able to dabble in repressed anger and jealously, Daniel Radcliff plays around with multiple characters early on, and Emma Watson is placed into positions where Hermione is not in charge of herself or the situation- fear and worry is seen.
For those that know me, Death has been one of my favourite personifications, and I was glad that he made a dignified and artistically pleasing entry into the series through the tale of the three brothers- the explanation of the Deathly Hallows.
The film is spaced out- which does the film good, allowing for the tension and characters to breath, as compared to the previous film, where it seemed to rush from teen romantic comedy to need to be serious Voldie's back.
For those with children perhaps consider the following; there is blood- and disfigurement, torture scenes, desperation, rage, and what appears to be an odd semi-sex scene between Harry and Hermione. These might cause you some concern because before this they have mostly been absent from the films, and brings it into the adult realm.
To balance this out though there are laughs to be had- mostly from Weasley clan, all who have gotten their characters down well. Also be warned there are lines that shout of sexual innuendo;
'Take it off! Take it off!', 'It's only about 10 inches, not much', and so on.
Following in true Harry Potter style we are introduced to our Deux Ex Machina in the odd embodiment of slightly annoying Dobby. Who clicks his fingers, and whisks people away all to the enjoyment of the characters. I'm once again left wondering why in that 'large bag' (those who have seen it well get that reference) Hermione does not have that time travelling medallion she had in 'Prisoner'.
Downsides well, I did not get to see a whole lot of Ginny Weasley (Bonnie Wright), and Luna Lovegood (Evanna Lynch) is underused, also we do not see what has happened to Hogwarts- it obviously has not closed down if characters are still catching the train there- maybe that happens in Part 2.
All in all, it was a great night, great show, great party, then an enjoyable film (thought I was going to say great huh- we will see with the second half, I'm considering it only half the story, so therefore only half of the film). I would definitely recommend seeing either show, but keep in mind Harry will be showing for weeks to come, and Vince and Ralph have to go by the end of the week!
Booking for Strange Bedfellows;
http://www.strangebedfellows.com.au/
or at the Cinema (Strangely were you also go to see Hp 7 P1).
Dale Stam
After the show the majority of cast and volunteers went down to the Wine Room to celebrate Joseph's birthday (the Head of AWTC). It seemed as if we had all flooded into this bar and well being loud theatre people, the bar quickly became ours. It was nice to see the actors of the show at rest- it is one of those 'humanising' aspects that allows us to view these what some people would call 'stars' as humans. To see John Wood smiling and laughing with a drink in his hand, and to see Peter Cousens leaning back in his chair, with an air of relaxing relief. It reminds me of how I felt after various shows, and at parties...just being able to enjoy where I was at that point in time. To be content.
After a rousing performance of 'Happy Birthday' we enjoyed some cup cakes...crunchie or cherry ripe- which were not only rich, but had actual chunks inside- a splendid- elegant touch to the proceedings. My thoughts were briefly cast back to the homeless man who had been outside of the theatre. Is my enjoyment of this moment a slap in his face? Is the enjoyment of oneself more important then the benefit of others- would he have even accepted my cupcake- he seemed to be spiteful that we were promoting a show that in his own words 'only the rich can see'. Would giving him the cake have made him into what he most hated, rich. Would he have even understood the metaphysical property of this transaction? He was also 'fighting the devil', so I am pretty sure he would have not liked the cake if he was true to his convictions- because to indulge so would have sent his mind off- if we bring into the fold the previous question.
Anyway we headed on down to the theatre before the lock out to see the new Harry Potter. We headed in and lined up, then behind us lined up Peter and Melissa Langton (Vonny). We waited for a few minutes and wondered why the line was not moving. It turns out that there was actually up to three different lines, and I was out of line. I do not know how this had happened, I had not moved. In the middle of this angst, Bec Simmons took a slap, and I spun around into Josh Feldschuh (Hughie) and he fell back to. Bec had successfully taken out one volunteer and one cast member in one slap...she has got some hand.
Eventually we got into the cinema. We all scattered around trying to figure out where we should sit. We had about ten minutes until midnight, with jokes and jaffa's being hurled. It was a great atmosphere. Our inspiring chants of preview, preview, preview were unsuccessful in making the previews start...although I understand. The law states that the cinema could not show the film until just after midnight- and because the film (is it still a roll of film nowadays?) comes complete with the previews attached they are classified as the same thing. One of the cast actually made a good comment that the film itself is like a 2 plus hour preview.
After this we had a few unsuccessful countdowns for the start of the film, probably because all of our clocks and watches had different times- we should have synchronised people! Then the lights went dark, and the film began.
Having not read beyond book 4 in the series, I was new to the whole horcrux thing. I understood that it was the containment of Voldemort's soul, which was split into 7 odd pieces, but I was wondering if that was so, wouldn't each destruction of a horcrux shift him further towards the remaining parts of his soul...was his soul divided into certain sections, or just randomly?
Besides this, HP 7 P1 was starting to head into the area that a lot of us have been waiting for...a more grungy war-like picture. It removed the easy landscape of Hogwarts- and placed us into a world where there is an overwhelming power, and various resistance groups running around. For those who know their history, or dystopian fiction, it is easy to pick up the references to totalitarianism, and oppression. I was reminded of various things such as the rounding up of the half bloods in relation to the rounding up of people of the Jewish faith, or the Reds in McCarthy America. The blatant propaganda of the Soviet and Nazi periods. The rigged court room trials of the Witch Hunts (oddly appropriate reference). The use of codewords and secret phrases we have heard of or seen in spy movies. It easily classifies as the darkest film because it deals with these foundations, as compared to the previous- teen angst and the 'big baddie'- it fleshed out the darkness in the world.
Obviously not having read the book, certain character names slipped by me, and some of their reasoning seemed a little convenient. At the heart of this film are the three leads, sure there is still the supporting cast which do well, but they are less important this time around. Each actor has grown into their role, and the audience was having fun with the exploration of the depth of these characters. It was also nice to see some stretching by the actors into areas that they had not been able to explore before. Rupert Grint is able to dabble in repressed anger and jealously, Daniel Radcliff plays around with multiple characters early on, and Emma Watson is placed into positions where Hermione is not in charge of herself or the situation- fear and worry is seen.
For those that know me, Death has been one of my favourite personifications, and I was glad that he made a dignified and artistically pleasing entry into the series through the tale of the three brothers- the explanation of the Deathly Hallows.
The film is spaced out- which does the film good, allowing for the tension and characters to breath, as compared to the previous film, where it seemed to rush from teen romantic comedy to need to be serious Voldie's back.
For those with children perhaps consider the following; there is blood- and disfigurement, torture scenes, desperation, rage, and what appears to be an odd semi-sex scene between Harry and Hermione. These might cause you some concern because before this they have mostly been absent from the films, and brings it into the adult realm.
To balance this out though there are laughs to be had- mostly from Weasley clan, all who have gotten their characters down well. Also be warned there are lines that shout of sexual innuendo;
'Take it off! Take it off!', 'It's only about 10 inches, not much', and so on.
Following in true Harry Potter style we are introduced to our Deux Ex Machina in the odd embodiment of slightly annoying Dobby. Who clicks his fingers, and whisks people away all to the enjoyment of the characters. I'm once again left wondering why in that 'large bag' (those who have seen it well get that reference) Hermione does not have that time travelling medallion she had in 'Prisoner'.
Downsides well, I did not get to see a whole lot of Ginny Weasley (Bonnie Wright), and Luna Lovegood (Evanna Lynch) is underused, also we do not see what has happened to Hogwarts- it obviously has not closed down if characters are still catching the train there- maybe that happens in Part 2.
All in all, it was a great night, great show, great party, then an enjoyable film (thought I was going to say great huh- we will see with the second half, I'm considering it only half the story, so therefore only half of the film). I would definitely recommend seeing either show, but keep in mind Harry will be showing for weeks to come, and Vince and Ralph have to go by the end of the week!
Booking for Strange Bedfellows;
http://www.strangebedfellows.com.au/
or at the Cinema (Strangely were you also go to see Hp 7 P1).
Dale Stam
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)